{"id":957,"date":"2023-06-07T02:42:23","date_gmt":"2023-06-07T02:42:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/publications-til-poerksen\/"},"modified":"2024-06-05T03:54:35","modified_gmt":"2024-06-05T03:54:35","slug":"publications-til-poerksen","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Warnings (in competition law) as a service of the warning party to the warned party subject to VAT<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 13\/2017, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

No lapse of the risk of repetition with a notarized cease-and-desist declaration<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2016, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

VAT place of supply for services provided electronically<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT-Recht 22\/2016, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Revocation in distance selling law only abusive in exceptional cases<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 11\/2016, Note 6<\/p>\n\n

Status of the discussion on the “Privacy Shield” following the opinion of the Art. 29 Working Party<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT Law 9\/2016, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Inadmissible prohibition of assignment for warranty claims in consumer transactions<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 23\/2015, Note 6<\/p>\n\n

BFH: VAT liability for eBay sales “on behalf of third parties” (140 fur coats)<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 21\/2015, Note 6<\/p>\n\n

Free WLAN networks for everyone! Or not? Draft bill to amend the TMG<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 7\/2015, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Liability of the GmbH managing director for copyright infringements<\/strong>Comment on OLG Cologne, judgment of 05.12.2014 | 6 U 57\/14Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 7\/2015, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

Automated e-mail responses and \u00a7 5 TMG – Google’s imprint insufficient! <\/strong>Comment on LG Berlin, judgment of 28.08.2014 | 52 O 135\/13Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2014, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Choice of law clauses vis-\u00e0-vis consumers in distance selling law<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 23\/2014, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

But no transfer claim for .eu domains!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Comment on OLG Stuttgart of 28.05.2014 – 2 U 147\/13Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 16\/2014, Note 6<\/p>\n\n

Violation of personality rights by auto-complete in search engines<\/strong>Comment on OLG Cologne of 08.04.2014 – 15 U 199\/11Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 10\/2014, Note 4<\/p>\n\n

Shift of the place of supply for VAT purposes for electronic services from 2015<\/strong> Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 7\/2014, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Entitlement to domain transfer for .eu domains<\/strong>Comment on LG Stuttgart of 26.09.2013 – 17 O 1069\/12Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 3\/2014, Note 4<\/p>\n\n

(You’d better don’t) Tell a friend – The BGH and the recommendation function<\/strong> Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 25\/2013, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

Admissible 7-day storage of IP addresses by ISP providers without cause<\/strong>Comment on OLG Frankfurt, judgment of 28.08.2013 | 13 U 105\/07Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 20\/2013, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

No entrepreneurial activity in the sale of 142 fur coats via eBay<\/strong>Comment on Stuttgart tax court, judgment of 18.07.2012 | 14 K 702\/10Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 12\/2013, Note 6<\/p>\n\n

Double-opt-in in the light of current case law<\/strong> Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 5\/2013, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

Expiry of the right to injunctive relief under copyright law in the event of an abusive warning? (“Holiday luxury apartment”)<\/strong>Comment on BGH 1st Civil Senate, judgment of 31.05.2012 | I ZR 106\/10Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 7\/2013, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

Indication of a shipping time of “expected 1-3 working days” in e-commerce inadmissible<\/strong>Comment on OLG Bremen, judgment of 05.10.2012 | 2 U 49\/12Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 1\/2013, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Publication of lists of opponents on the Internet by lawyers<\/strong> Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 19\/2012, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

On the liability of the Admin-C of a domain<\/strong>Comment on KG Berlin, judgment of 03.07.2012 | 5 U 15\/12Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 17\/2012, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

Liability for integration of RSS feeds<\/strong>Comment on BGH, judgment of 27.03.2012 | VI ZR 144\/11Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 12\/2012, Note 4<\/p>\n\n

Right of withdrawal for contract amendments?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Comment on OLG Koblenz, judgment of 28.03.2012 | U 1166\/11Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 10\/2012, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

Preventive cease-and-desist declarations – especially in the case of file sharing<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 6\/2012, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

No jurisdiction of German courts for order pursuant to Section 101 para. 9 UrhG for Internet service providers based abroad<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Comment on OLG Munich, decision of 12.09.2011 | 29 W 1634\/11Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2011, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

No liability of the access provider for copyright infringements by its customers<\/strong>Comment on Regional Court Cologne, judgment of 31.08.2011 | 28 O 362\/10Til P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 23\/2011, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

No information or storage of IP addresses “on demand”<\/strong>Comment on OLG D\u00fcsseldorf, judgment of March 15, 2011 | I-20 U 136\/10,20 U 136\/10Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 14\/2011, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

Advertising with warranty declarations in e-commerce<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 12\/2011, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

The (electronic) consent to telephone advertising – even if aDouble opt-in does not help!<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 10\/2011, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

No information or storage of IP addresses “on demand”<\/strong>Comment on OLG D\u00fcsseldorf, judgment of March 15, 2011 | I-20 U 136\/10,20 U 136\/10Til P\u00f6rksen | juris PraxisReport IT-Recht 9\/2011, Note 5<\/p>\n\n

Artists’ social insurance and web design for non-profit organization<\/strong>Comment on SG Dortmund, judgment of 25.02.2011 | S 34 R 321\/08Til P\u00f6rksen | juris PraxisReport IT-Recht 6\/2011, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

La Loi HADOPI – On the way to network blocking in France<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 19\/2010, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

GTC control for telemedia even without conclusion of a contract?<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 7\/2010, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

Obligation of access providers to store relevant traffic data on demand<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 4\/2010, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

When does a jurisdiction fly? – On the flying jurisdiction in the context of copyright infringements on the internet<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 1\/2010, Note 3<\/p>\n\n

Making available to the public pursuant to Section 19a UrhG for unlinked internet content<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 22\/2009, Note 4<\/p>\n\n

Trade in virtual goods in online games<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 13\/2009, Note 2<\/p>\n\n

The use of RFID chips for location-based services<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 4\/2009, Note 4<\/p>\n\n

Availability clauses in provider contracts in the light of case law<\/strong>Til P\u00f6rksen | AnwaltZertifikatOnline IT-Recht 2\/2009, Note 4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Warnings (in competition law) as a service of the warning party to the warned party subject to VATTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 13\/2017, Note 5 No lapse of the risk of repetition with a notarized cease-and-desist declarationTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2016, Note 5 VAT place of supply for services provided electronicallyTil P\u00f6rksen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nPublications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Warnings (in competition law) as a service of the warning party to the warned party subject to VATTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 13\/2017, Note 5 No lapse of the risk of repetition with a notarized cease-and-desist declarationTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2016, Note 5 VAT place of supply for services provided electronicallyTil P\u00f6rksen […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-05T03:54:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/\",\"name\":\"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-07T02:42:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-05T03:54:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/start\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/\",\"name\":\"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coxlegal-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coxlegal-logo.jpg\",\"width\":295,\"height\":124,\"caption\":\"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","og_description":"Warnings (in competition law) as a service of the warning party to the warned party subject to VATTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 13\/2017, Note 5 No lapse of the risk of repetition with a notarized cease-and-desist declarationTil P\u00f6rksen | jurisPraxisReport IT Law 24\/2016, Note 5 VAT place of supply for services provided electronicallyTil P\u00f6rksen […]","og_url":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/","og_site_name":"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","article_modified_time":"2024-06-05T03:54:35+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/","url":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/","name":"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen - C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-06-07T02:42:23+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-05T03:54:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/publications-til-poerksen\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/start\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Publications Til P\u00f6rksen"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/","name":"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#organization","name":"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH","url":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coxlegal-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coxlegal-logo.jpg","width":295,"height":124,"caption":"C.O.X.legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/957"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=957"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":959,"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/957\/revisions\/959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cox-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}